It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes. Late responses shall be handled as appeals. Where it is suspected that a submitted assessment task, or part thereof, has not been written by the Student the Unit Coordinator may ask the Investigating Officer to arrange an examination on the relevant topic as part of the process of determination of authorship. Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: To view historic versions, click the link in the document’s navigation bar. Participants in the viva voce examination should include:.
Examples of acts of inadvertent plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. Examples of acts of intentional plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. These reports must ensure that parties involved cannot be identified. It plays a major role in academic assessment by demonstrating how well the student has taken into account work produced by others as a basis for her or his own independent learning outcomes. Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees:
A new penalty applied under these circumstances may be appealed in accordance with these Procedures.
They will be granted at least ten working days from the date of notification to prepare for the interview or provide a response in writing to the complaint including any evidence in defence of the complaint. Acknowledgment of the work of others is not simply a matter of honesty.
Where an investigator determines that, prior to the submission of the current assignment, a Student had been informed that there have been two or more previously recorded occurrences of proven Inadvertent Plagiarism, the investigation of the most recent allegation shall proceed on the basis that the allegation is of Intentional Plagiarism.
Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation.
Effective learning frequently requires both demonstrated knowledge and critical evaluation of the work of others. Englanr author and the source must be identified clearly whenever the ideas, words, drawings, designs, data, computer programs, performances or creative works of others are used.
Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation. Late responses shall be handled as appeals.
Student Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism (Coursework) Rule
Student Assist can advise any University Member or member of the public on how to make a formal complaint. The examination may be a supervised written examination or a viva voce examination. Anonymous complaints will not be accepted for investigation.
Plagiarism that is a result of negligence is included in this definition. An Authorised Appeals Officer must not have been involved in the initial investigation or determination of the case.
To view the current version, click the link in the document’s navigation bar. A Support Person may be a friend, University Representative or family member. xcademic
Student Coursework Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism Rules / Document / UNE Policy Register System
This Declaration affirms that the student agrees that:. The Support Person must not be a member of the legal profession. Good scholarship refers to and builds upon the work of others. The records must be retained for at least ten years after the student’s graduation from the University.
Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Procedures / UNE Policy Register System
A Support Person does not speak on behalf of the Student and is not an advocate. Reasonable grounds may include, but are not limited to, discrepancies between the assessment task and the previous performance of the student s in the unit.
Section 1 – Overviews 1 These clursework outline the implementation of the Student Coursework Academic Misconduct Rule “the Rule” and must be read in conjunction with that Rule. Examples of acts of inadvertent plagiarism are provided in the Appendix to these Rules. Late responses shall be handled as appeals. The University does not tolerate dishonesty and impropriety in academic work and imposes strict penalties on any student found to mjsconduct acted dishonestly or improperly in assessment processes.
Access to these records is limited to the following or nominees: This report should also specify the nature of the penalty and the final decision-maker in each instance. This penalty may only be applied to breaches specified under Paragraph 10b vi — xii and Paragraph 10c xi — xii.
Where the Academic Director is also the Unit Coordinator, the Head of School or nominee is authorised to investigate and impose penalties. Where the case is dealt with as intentional plagiarism the Student will be provided with a copy of these Rules and will be advised in writing of:. Only the Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean or nominee may act under the circumstances set out in Paragraph 37 and In those cases the University aims to offer, in the first instance, support and advice, and penalties at the lower end of the scale will usually be imposed for a first incident i.
Assessment tasks can be designed for diagnostic, formative, summative, evaluative or informative purposes. Appellants should structure their appeal in terms of Paragraph a — c and provide evidence to support their appeal.